Skip to main content

Climate Change

Connect any of the stories we’ve read this semester to the current global crisis. How does the story help us understand our time? How do current events affect how we understand the story?
The story “There Will Come Soft Rains” depicts a destitute, post-apocalyptic scenario: humans are presumably extinct. The house, which represents the last trace of humanity on Earth, begins to deteriorate, breaking down and eventually being consumed by fire. It’s a bleak scene, as nature reclaims what ultimately always belonged to it. Based on the historical context, this story, which was written in 1950, can be interpreted as a criticism of the tensions of the Cold War. It illustrates the potential future of humanity wiping itself out through nuclear war, leaving nature to slowly reclaim the Earth, until the last house which represents millions of years of our civilization turns to dust.

This story presents the idea of nature being a higher power which is above petty human conflict—it’s a force that will continue to move regardless of what we humans do. The global crisis we face immediately is a plague, but an even more pressing issue we face currently is climate change, which can release many plagues far worse than this one. As permafrost melts, diseases we thought we had eradicated and conquered will return, and ancient diseases we’ve never seen will come back to plague us. When addressing the climate change crisis, we often talk about how we are destroying the planet. The idea presented in “There Will Come Soft Rains” that nature transcends humanity can give us a new perspective when looking at the crisis. Rather than thinking we are destroying the planet, we should take the perspective that we are destroying ourselves. The plagues, wildfires, floods, and myriads of other natural disasters are just that: natural. They are a part of nature. No matter what we do, nature will be ever present, even if it is to consume the last house which stands as evidence of our civilization.

Comments

  1. UnknownMay 11, 2020 at 12:05 PM

    Great overview of “There Will Come Soft Rains” in your opening paragraph! Your discussion in the second paragraph uses the story to offer an insightful reframing of the climate crisis: you point out that the story shows that nature will outlast humanity, so in altering the planet (through our behaviors that are causing climate change) “we are destroying ourselves.” Your final point—“No matter what we do, nature will be ever present, even if it is to consume the last house which stands as evidence of our civilization.”—brings the post to a strong and striking conclusion. Thanks for this thoughtful post! - Ms. O'Brien

    ReplyDelete
  2. Nicole SoutheyMay 13, 2020 at 12:17 AM

    I really like your analysis. I have definitely heard something about how ultimately in time the planet would recover it would take a crazy amount of time and all of humanity and what we know would be long gone. I wonder if this idea that we are saving ourselves rather than the planet would inspire more people to act on climate change.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How short is too short

Prompt 1) Q&A: How short is too short While the length of different literary mediums are not strictly defined, we as consumers have a good sense if something is too long or too short. We often make critiques on the length of films or shows, either being too rushed or too drawn out. On the one hand a film can’t be so short that it doesn’t allocate enough time to significantly develop the characters and plot, but it also can’t be so intricate that it bores the readers. In my opinion, The Fall of the House of Usher falls in the latter category. That thing put me to sleep . You could probably cut out 50% of the words and still achieve the same effect as the original text (a slight exaggeration, but you know how it is). When I read First Person Shooter , my initial impression was the opposite—it tried to do too much and ran out of room, so it left many loose ends. It left me wondering: was this short story too short? The thing that bothered me most was the subplot of the main ch
11 comments
Read more

"Who's to know"

Alternative title: “Who’s to know” The original title “Barbie-Q” is probably a play on the word “barbeque”, since at the end of the story the narrator mentions that the dolls come from a factory that burned down the night before. I really like this title because the fun wordplay actually describes a pretty disturbing image of a human-like doll being burned and slowly melted. Freaky. This contrast shows in the story as well. The narrator takes an unwavering fun and excited tone throughout the entire story, even during the mention of the factory fire. When she hears the news, she is really excited because the fire means she gets to buy some toys on the cheap. However, if you think just a little harder, her excitement completely overlooks the disturbing reality that a whole factory burned down and probably some people with it. I don’t know if this signifies some other deeper meaning to the story, but I just found the connection between the tone of the title and this scene very interes
3 comments
Read more